ASSAP: Paranormal Research
ASSAP: Paranormal Education
Privacy and cookie information ASSAP mailing list
 
 

Maurice TownsendWelcome to the ASSAP paranormal blog! Though this blog is aimed at anyone interested in the paranormal, it will be of particular interest to the paranormal research community. Updated frequently, but not regularly (don't expect something new every day!), it covers any paranormal topic, as well as highlighting recent changes to the ASSAP website. You may not notice it but this site changes on an almost daily basis.

Whenever new information becomes available on a subject ASSAP covers, it is added to the relevant pages of the website straight away. So, just because you've read a page, don't assume it will still be exactly the same when you next look. That way the ASSAP website remains an up to date research resource.

The photo (above right, pic by Val Hope) is the ASSAP blogger himself, out looking for anomalies wherever they are to be found, so that you can read about them here. To contact the ASSAP blog, email here.

Important note: If anything in this blog does not make sense, try following the links in text! If it still doesn't make sense, that's probably my fault ...

Previous blog pages ... (including ghosts, UFOs, poltergeists, flying rods, miracles, orbs, hypnotic regression, big cats, vampires, near sleep experiences, premonitions, shadow ghosts, paranormal photos, auras, river monsters and dozens of other subjects)

NB: WDTHDWP = 'what does this have to do with the paranormal'

20 October: Ghost in red?

Red ghostOn two occasions recently I've seen a sign as a ghost (see here and here). It might seem unlikely to some that a sign could be misperceived as a human, or ghostly, figure. Then, unexpectedly, I found I had a chance to illustrate the phenomenon of ' ghostly signs'.

I was looking at a photo I'd taken recently when I noticed a figure in the background that I hadn't noticed at the time. It was someone in the distance, apparently dressed in red. You can see the figure in the photo here (right) which is a cropped version of the original (otherwise completely unedited). The figure appears to have a small head and rather prominent shoulders.

I really thought this was a person (or ghost), at first glance. Zooming in the 'figure', it looked too rectangular. Looking at other photos, taken at the same location at the same time, I found several examples of rectangular red signs with similar proportions. By chance, there was also a very real person in a red top in one photo. However, their shoulders were nothing like as square! Interestingly, this person was around the same height as the red signs.

I'm in no doubt that the red object in this photo is one of the signs at this site. It may not look terribly convincing, to most people, as a human figure, particularly on prolonged close examination. However, it does demonstrate that signs can be of similar height and proportions to real human figures and in locations where people might well stand. I think the photo shows that signs are a credible source of ghostly misperception, when seen briefly, in peripheral vision or poor viewing conditions.

19 October: Life suddenly goes into fast forward!

Crows in a treeLooking out of a train window recently a witness experienced something extraordinary. The train was stopped at a station but suddenly the witness felt they were moving. But out of the window the station was still there. It was not one of those experiences of false movement when a train on an adjacent track is moving. There was no other train present.

It suddenly became apparent that the train really WAS moving, despite appearances to the contrary. But the strangest bit was this. The scenery briefly went by much FASTER than the speed of the train. It appeared to be catching up with reality! It was like watching a recording in fast forward mode. So what is going on?

Regular readers will probably be unsurprised to know the witness was my acquaintance (MA) who gets microsleep with REM (MWR) experiences. MA goes straight into a dream state during microsleep episodes that last just seconds. Being awake before and after means that the dream episode can feel very much like a waking experience. A small proportion of the general population, typically with certain sleep disorders, have such experiences.

What appears to have happened is that MA went into a MWR while the train was stopped at the station. As the train moved off MA was actually seeing a dream version of the station, indistinguishable from the real thing. The motion of train probably stirred MA out of the MWR. On coming out of the MWR MA's brain had a conflict between live visual input, showing the train moving, and the MWR showing a stationary scene. In order to reconcile the two MA's brain did a 'fast forward' of the scene to catch up with reality. It could simply have 'jumped ahead' but presumably decided that a fast forward was more 'realistic'! The way such sensory conflicts are resolved by our brains leads to apparently strange experiences that nevertheless appear realistic. It is easy to see why they would be interpreted as paranormal.

I can't think of a paranormal report exactly like this incident. However, it is easy to see how such an incident could be viewed as paranormal, or possibly the effect of alien technology, by a witness. It could even be seen as a manipulation of time or space. It is certainly something to consider when people report bizarre time or space distortion effects.

"The point is, we're in a little trouble if you don't ..." This was the latest snippet overheard by MA during a separate purely aural MWR incident. It is typically frustrating. Is the speaker actually talking to MA, or a third party? What has MA, or a third party, not done? Not least, what is the trouble? Intriguingly, the 'my point is' phrase implies that we are coming in at the middle of a conversation even though it is all MA heard. Remember that all this content comes from MA's own brain. So are these scenes being played out unconsciously before MA hears them or do they simply appear as if they have already started? What ius certain is that they could easily give the impression of having originated outside MA's brain.

16 October: Scary ghosts?

VigilWhy are ghosts supposed to be scary? I say 'supposed' because I have not found my own encounters with ghosts scary. Until now ...

I was on a train, gazing out of the window, as you do. My attention was caught by a tall dark figure standing very close to the track by an overbridge. For some reason I cannot fathom, a feeling of dread enveloped me as I saw that figure. I stared at it intently as we passed by. That's when I realised that the figure was, in fact, a sign, with similar dimensions to a large man. The ghost was a particularly effective misperception. I was certainly in no doubt, when I first saw it, that it was a person. Indeed, I was surprised that the train driver did not sound the horn in warning.

Later I tried to analyze why this particular ghost left me with a feeling of dread. I may have been worried that the figure was so close to the track that there might be a horrible accident, though this didn't occur to me consciously at the time. Another possibility is that the lighting made the 'figure' look sinister. The short rail trip I was on is one I do frequently but I'd never seen the sign before. It might be a new sign but it is more likely I'd simply never noticed it before. The lighting, from an overcast sky, may have highlighted the sign relative to its background, bringing it to my attention. The sign is unusually tall for a person which may make it look a bit threatening, I suppose. Either way, I thought I was watching a real person at the time so I never felt afraid because I thought it was a ghost.

Many people are afraid of ghosts, despite having never seen one. On the other hand, many witnesses are, as in the current incident, not even aware that they are seeing a ghost at the time they experience one. So they are unlikely to be scared at the time of the sighting.

Hauntings, on the other hand, are understandably disturbing. Having apparently random unexplained events occur frequently in the same location is likely to be unsettling. As I've pointed out before, we do not know that ghosts actually produce hauntings. For instance, ghosts are not seen actually doing haunting stuff like moving objects. And they only appear in a relatively small number of hauntings. In addition, ghosts are often seen without any associated haunting phenomena. This suggests that the idea that hauntings are what ghosts do is not a robust conclusion from the actual evidence. So, while I can see how hauntings can be scary, I'm not so sure most ghost actually deserve their scary reputation. Nor am I convinced they produce hauntings.

14 October: Touched by a ghost!

Crows in a treeThe witness was sitting on a moving train, looking out of the window. They felt someone sit down in the adjacent seat. Curiosity soon got the better of the witness who, after a few seconds, turned to casually look at their new neighbour. There was no one there!

That's the basic account, now for the detail which is vital in understanding paranormal cases. First of all, the 'witness' is my acquaintance (MA) who has microsleep with REM (MWR) experiences. MA goes straight into a dream state during microsleep episodes that last just seconds. Being awake before and after means that the dream episode can feel very much like a waking experience. A small proportion of the general population, typically with certain sleep disorders, have such experiences.

MA did not actually see or hear anything. It is possible the ghost made a noise while sitting down but this could have been drowned out by the train noises. Instead there was only the physical feeling of someone's clothes touching MA's when the ghost sat down. It felt perfectly normal, just as if a real human being had sat there. It was not possible for the ghost to have actually been a real person as MA still felt the 'contact' while turning round. MA does not recall exactly when this feeling stopped. A crucial point is that MA remembers coming out of a MWR while turning to look at the ghost. So the experience definitely appears to be a MWR episode. However, crucially, this is the first time MA has ever felt anything physical in such an experience. MA's MWRs have hitherto been exclusively visual and / or aural.

This is very interesting! It means that MWRs can involve physical sensations as well as visual and auditory ones. It is not yet known if the three can combine in one experience. We'll have to wait and see. Interestingly, MA did NOT feel any sense of presence. There was, instead, the normal physical sensation of someone's clothes touching MA's. It was so real that MA was shocked to see no one there. And this is someone for who strange experiences have become routine.

This physical sensation clearly extends the range of reports of apparently paranormal phenomena that MWRs can cover. For instance, in some ghost cases there are reports of witnesses apparently being touched by someone, or something, invisible. These reports no longer rule out the possibility of MWRs as a possible xenonormal explanation.

12 October: When considering lights in the sky ...

UFOI took this light in the sky photo (right) recently. It was dusk with no cloud. The foreground is a roof with chimney. The photo here is a cropped section of the original but is otherwise unaltered. Many UFO sightings are described as lights in the sky. Anyone taking this photo would, therefore, feel entitled to report it as a UFO.

So what is it? Luckily, it is one of a whole series of photos showing the same object. In most shots the light is not in the sky at all but in front of buildings or the ground! Knowing the background behind the taking of a photo is often crucial to understanding it. So here's what actually happened.

I was taking photos when I noticed a curious glowing light some of the shots. The object, initially apparently just above the ground, moved as I panned around. In fact, it clearly moved synchronously with the camera movements. It was, thus, obviously, a photographic artefact. I then deliberately panned the camera to a position that placed the glowing object in the sky. The result is the photo here.

The glowing object is actually lens flare caused by a bright streetlight in the original (uncropped) frame. Had someone taken just one photo, with the light in the sky, it might have been interpreted as a UFO. I've not come across a UFO photo that was obviously lens flare to date but that may only be because I hadn't thought it would produce a convincing UFO. But it turns out that lens flare IS something to be eliminated when considering UFO photos after all.

7 October: Monk and nun ghosts

Shadow in treesI've heard that ghosts of nuns and monks are common in the UK (see here, for instance). I say 'heard' because I've not come across many contemporary accounts personally. So, either my sample of ghosts is atypical or the monk / nun form may be disappearing. I was prompted to think about such ghosts by a recent experience.

I was out and about when I caught sight of what appeared to be a nun's wimple. It was an oval white shape with a yellowish circle in the middle. For a few seconds it really WAS a nun, to me anyway. I was startled as it was not a place where I'd ever expect to see a nun. Given that fact, I wondered if it might be a ghost. And when the 'nun' vanished, to be replace by a white sign, my ghost suspicion was confirmed. It was a classic misperception ghost. I could not see the writing on the sign from a distance making its true identity unobvious. The circle in the middle, giving the impression of a face, was actually a picture. The yellow colour was not obvious from at the distance where I originally saw the ghost.

The experience demonstrated to me why monks and nuns ought be fairly common as misperception ghosts. All you really need is a dark shape resembling a figure, such as a shadow, with a lighter area suggesting a face in an appropriate position. Then you have the classic monk in a habit. I tried taking some photos of suitable shadows in foliage to see if one resembled a monk or nun.

The photo (above right) is the nearest I got to a shadowy 'monk' figure. The 'ghostly figure' is in the centre of the photo. There is a suggestion of a 'cowl' at the top, formed by some leaves. It looked like a ghostly monk figure, briefly, when seen with the naked eye. However, in the photo it is possible to examine the image at leisure so its inadequacies become plain to seek. I only spent a few minutes trying to get shadow 'monk' type photos. I'm sure that with a bit more effort I could get a reasonably convincing photo of such a ghost.

So, if monk ghosts are relatively easy to misperceive, why haven't I seen them before? And why have I not come across many contemporary reports of them? I think it may be because such dark figures are more likely to be labelled as shadow ghosts these days. As far as I recall, shadow ghosts only appear to have come to prominence relatively recently. Are monk ghosts and shadow ghosts different interpretations of the same basic kind of apparition? If anyone has any information on the history of monk ghosts and shadow ghosts I'd be interested to hear about it.

PS: By coincidence (or not), a few days after taking these photos I saw two real nuns. It was the first time I'd seen any in years!

1 October: White ghost in a tree!

Greek statue (not)So, I was looking through some recent photos, as you do, when I found a ghost. I should say, straight away, that I deliberately take photos in situations where I think something resembling a ghost might appear in the resulting picture. But this was NOT one of those photos. It was, instead, a rather distant picture of a bird. I wasn't expecting anything odd in the photo at all but I could hardly miss it when I looked. I have cropped the photo (right) to highlight the ghost, otherwise it is unaltered.

To me, the pale object (top centre) looks like the profile view of a head facing left. I can see an eye, a mouth, a nose, a hairline and a neck. Shadows suggest that the head is illuminated from the left. My first thought was that it was a classical Greek statue.

So, if it most closely resembles a statue, why am I calling it a ghost? Well, one popular idea about ghosts is that they are pale or white. In reality, witnesses usually report ghosts as looking just like normal everyday people. As discussed recently (here) popular ideas about ghosts generally differ widely from real life reports. My point is that I can easily see how someone discovering this 'statue head' in a photo they'd taken might report it as a ghost.

So what is it? There is no statue, Greek or otherwise, at the location. The 'statue head' effect is clouds seen through a hole in tree branches. That it resembles a statue is pure coincidence. In the field of anomalous phenomena, coincidence is frequently mentioned in connection with subjects like precognition or telepathy. But it is actually an important factor throughout the whole field of anomalous phenomena. It can explain many apparent paranormal reports. For more on this subject see here.

Last month's (September) website figures are an average of 14728 hits per day. This is slightly down on the previous month's 15165 daily average.

© Maurice Townsend 2015

ASSAP

Previous blog pages ...

  • Sep 2015 (including glowing transparent ghost, unsettling ghost, insect ghost, UFO in clouds, linear photo anomalies)
  • Aug 2015 (including alien robot, white UFO, unlikely prediction comes true, animal ghosts. streaks in photos)
  • July 2015 (including coincidence versus precognition, paranormal smells, music and ghosts)
  • June 2015 (including interactive ghost, presence on train, orbs, spade wings)
  • May 2015 (including ghosts seen during vigils, mystery flash, sense of presence, transparent ghost, daytime UFO)
  • Apr 2015 (including UFO behind trees, orbs behind anything, possible cause of road ghost sightings, white-hatted ghost)
  • Mar 2015 (including moving object looking motionless, retreating ghost, IFO turning into a UFO)
  • Feb 2015 (including best ghost yet, how things vanish, purple thing, ghost in inappropriate attire)
  • Jan 2015 (including winter insect orbs, ghost from a train, strangeness threshold, flashes in the sky)
  • Dec 2014 (including lumpy horizon, green blob, strange lights, orbs, white floating thing)
  • Nov 2014 (including doors opening by themselves, haunting flashes, sense of presence, formant noise)
  • Oct 2014 (including animal ghosts, tricorn-hatted figure, seeing 0.23 celebrities monthly, dancing ghost)
  • Sep 2014 (including paper defying gravity, low flying UFOs, photographing ghosts, moving still photos)
  • Aug 2014 (including figure on a pillar, orbs still worth studying, ghost objects, shadow ghost)
  • July 2014 (including yellow orb, teleportation, ghostly whispers, owl, strange announcement)
  • June 2014 (including hand in a tree, blurry flying object, white alien, strange pattern on a dragonfly)
  • May 2014 (including single witness UFOs, ghosts vanishing, anomalies seen through gaps, rock face, creeping doppelgangers)
  • Apr 2014 (including unrecognized ghosts, odd UFO photo, do short-sighted people see ghosts, man with no face)
  • Mar 2014 (including unusual shaped UFO, ghost on a train, ghost presence, vampires, ghost calling)
  • Feb 2014 (including confusion, daylight orbs, haunted milk bottle, ghost on a bridge, too obvious explantations)
  • Jan 2014 (including colliding orbs, ball lightning, de-orbing, ghost mouse, mysterious flashes, ghost misidentification)
  • Dec 2013 (including popping orbs, new shadow ghost, ignoring a ghostly hand, dust turning into orbs videoed)
  • Nov 2013 (including hearing voices, blurry ghosts, mirrors and ghosts, coincidences, UFOs near airports)
  • Oct 2013 (including fairy photo, mist ghost, yeti, premonitions, orbs are NOT dust, how hauntings start)
  • Sep 2013 (including moving sticks, targets affecting odds in psi tests, shape shifting, not photographing ghosts)
  • Aug 2013 (including ghosts in plain view, mystery photo, seeing faces, ear pointing, shadow presence, time distortion)
  • July 2013 (including floating ghosts, on being a ghost, ghost ducks, follow that ghost - yes, ghosts galore)
  • June 2013 (including transparent ghosts, distance of UFOs, other stuff going on while witnessing anomalous phenomena)
  • May 2013 (including ghost seen AND photographed, time distortion, reproducing anomalous phenomena)
  • Apr 2013 (including door ghost moving, UFOs from a train, missing time, reality glitches, EVP without E, weird photos)
  • Mar 2013 (including witness credibility, distraction to see ghosts, movie in real life, photo or witness)
  • Feb 2013 (including possible orb comeback, OBEs go mainstream, walking ghost, feelings without touch, object movement)
  • Jan 2013 (including a big problem with ghost vigils, time distortions, cryptids, snow ghosts and rods, causes of hauntings)
  • Dec 2012 (including mysterious injuries, ghosts versus people, voice from nowhere, experimenting with a ghost)
  • Nov 2012 (including reflected ghost, isolated EVPs, ghosts talking to each other, invisible presences)
  • Oct 2012 (including ghostly presence, shadow ghost, strange pigeons, window ghosts, hallucinations)
  • Sep 2012 (including yellow grass, weird waterfalls, vanishing buzzard, ghost vigils, slowing down time)
  • Aug 2012 (including seeing unknown animals, glowing lampposts, EMF meters as an accident of history)
  • July 2012 (including turning rods into orbs, psychic insight, making insects spell, glowing eyes, haunting hot spots)
  • June 2012 (including doppelganger mystery, not expecting ghosts, anecdotal evidence, credible witnesses)
  • May 2012 (including lenticular cloud, ghost encounter, ghost train, weird stuff in a tree, van Gogh, resolution)
  • Apr 2012 (including naturalists and ghosts, odd feelings during OBE, wrong kind of sound, voice from nowhere)
  • Mar 2012 (including jogging and ghosts, misty ghosts, image noise, full spectrum photography, EVP of machines)
  • Feb 2012 (including ghost car, analyzing anomalous photos, ghost at rock concert, OBEs and motion sickness)
  • Jan 2012 (including stopping flying rods, photographing fairies, time warp, a ghost tie, ghostly fingers, New Year UFOs)
  • Dec 2011 (including missing time, improving ghost vigils, anomalous photos, ghostly faces, seeing fiction)
  • Nov 2011 (including OBE video games, EVP and VLF, whatshisname, paranormal misconceptions, invisible ghosts)
  • Oct 2011 (including smartphone ghosts, similacrum, smell of ghosts, morphing UFOs, slowing time)
  • Sep 2011 (including tidy ghost, MADS, transparent ghost, big announcement, ghost fox, not alone)
  • Aug 2011 (including cold spots, spectral hound, triangular UFO, ghost photos, rushing air and being dragged)
  • July 2011 (including Hilary Evans, Harry Potter, witness investment, bias in paranormal research, TV detectives)
  • June 2011 (including ASSAP @ 30, detecting lies, hyper-vigilence, strange thunder)
  • May 2011 (including ASSAP @ 30, lone shoes, flying rods, bias, early memories, strange floating object)
  • Apr 2011 (including royal wedding, mirror touch synaesthesia, sleep disorders, new ghost sighting)
  • Mar 2011 (including roof heron, Atlantis, first time witnesses, comparing film to digital paranormal photos)
  • Feb 2011 (including predicting the future, ghost bird, time slip, weird floor, what do we really know about paranormal)
  • Jan 2011 (including the ghost hunting boom, orange UFO, EVP experiment, extreme normality)
  • Dec 2010 (including microsleeps and road ghosts, shadow ghost in snow, lack of ghosts in photos, anthropomorphism)
  • Nov 2010 (including EMF meters, auras, evidence for precognition, sensitisation, the ghost hunting boom)
  • Oct 2010 (including black orbs, UnConvention, mirror visions, levitation, flying rods and orbs)
  • Sep 2010 (including a ring tone from the roof, shadow ghost video, time slip explanation, daylight orb video)
  • Aug 2010 (including Parisian UFO, sense of presence, SLI, consulting experts, misperception)
  • Jul 2010 (including Sherlock Holmes as a paranormal investigator, haunting sounds, what ARE hallucinations)
  • Jun 2010 (including the Loch Ness Monster, gorilla video, getting ghost stories the wrong way round)
  • May 2010 (including ball lightning, Wem ghost photo, waking up twice, eyewitnesses, Robin Hood)
  • Apr 2010 (including causes of road ghosts, new orb evidence, bird UFOs, UFO photo, not quite seeing is believing)
  • Mar 2010 (including experiencing hypnagogia, consciousness, belief, prolonged misperception, doppelganger)
  • Feb 2010 (including visual continuity errors - AKA ghosts, near sleep experiences on trains, spontaneous OOBEs)
  • Jan 2010 (including intelligent oil, SLI, inducing OOBEs, orange UFOs, the bleak midwinter)
  • Dec 2009 (including review of research in the noughties, pretty orbs, imperceptions, river monster)
  • Nov 2009 (including EVP without a recorder, demons and entities, why only some people see ghosts)
  • Oct 2009 (including grey ghost, near sleep experiences, a triangular UFO and seeing David Beckham)
  • Sep 2009 (including latent memory, Tufted Puffin, Bermuda Triangle and garden poltergeist)
  • Aug 2009 (including official UFO files, partial ghosts, flying rods and miracles)
  • Jul 2009 (including garden poltergeist, big cat video, orbs and hypnotic regression)
  • Jun 2009 (including thoughts from nowhere, shadow ghosts, premonitions and metallic UFO)
  • May 2009 (including analysing paranormal photos, making ghosts and ghost lore)
  • Apr 2009 (including phantom bird, choice blindness and grass that gets up and walks away)
  • Mar 2009 (including deja vu, ghostly mists, weird UFO photo, white ghosts)
  • Feb 2009 (including hidden memories, coincidences, auras and window UFOs)
  • Jan 2009 (including animals sensing ghosts, vampires, flying rod season and a haunted path)
  • Dec 2008
  • Nov 2008
  • Oct 2008
  • Sep 2008
  • Aug 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • Even older